|
Post by Eric Gajewski on Jun 13, 2017 15:05:50 GMT
Tradcatknight: “Dogmatic certainty” that Francis is pope?One, we know that God did allow arguably 2/3 of the Church to follow a false pope at certain points during the Western Schism and the gates of Hell did not prevail then. So, why not 7/8 of the Church? How much is too much? In 1958, if you were to describe the Second Vatican Council and the destruction of the liturgy that followed to a devout Catholic, he likely would have laughed it off, saying, God will not allow it as this would be tantamount to the ‘gates of Hell prevailing’! If little else is crystal clear these days, it’s that God is willing to allow far more evil to enter the Church than most of us can imagine. Secondly, my friends are essentially insisting that God will allow certain devious men to force His hand in removing the papacy from His Vicar if only they are crafty enough to extort the pope into resignation with sufficient stealth. Is anyone really willing to hang their hat on this proposition? I’m not. In conclusion, make of these observations what you will, but just know that to insist that Francis’ acceptance provides “dogmatic certainty” that he is pope – in spite of any shenanigans that may have taken place with respect to Benedict’s resignation – you are also necessarily making claims that fly in the face of both faith and reason. tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2017/06/dogmatic-certainty-that-francis-is-pope.html#more
|
|