Prophetic Warnings

I wanted to post some interesting gematria somewhere. This is concerning correspondences between Tim Kaine and the Beast of Revelation. Note that if Hillary were elected, then died, Tim Kaine would be the most powerful man on earth. The most important part of this analysis is the Latin Cabala Simplex, which is based on text from the Vulgate.

But first the Hebrew. Now note that השׁר קאין = 666. (The nun = 50, of course.) Kaine, or Cain (קין) with an א added, is קאין in Hebrew. The spelling with the aleph, קאין, is a more direct transliteration of Kaine's name; also, the א represents the vowel point, because "Cain" is pronounced as two syllables in Hebrew, as kah-yin. "The Prince" is השׁר; and note that the Biblical Hebrew would have no word for "President." If Hillary were to be elected, then die in office, Kaine would be the "Prince" of the United States: thus Prince Kaine. This is still rather weak so far, but השׁר is in Daniel 12:1, referring to Michael,"the great prince," and Kaine's middle name is Michael. So I do find it somewhat interesting.

To break down the numerology of the two words, השׁר = 505, and קאין = 161.

Now we go on to Latin Cabala Simplex. The Apocalypse states that the Dragon gives the Beast "his power, and his seat, and great authority" (Rev 13:2). The Vulgate Latin words that can be substituted for Dragon and Timothy Kaine are Draconis (=75), Timotheus (=118), and Cain (=25), the Latin Simplex total for which = 218. As it turns out, this is the same as the total of the Vulgate's words for "six hundred threescore and six," which are "sescenti sexaginta sex," which = 218. In other words, the Latin words for 666 = Draconis Timotheus Cain! This is very straightforward; this is the Latin Simplex total for "sescenti sexaginta sex," which is in Revelation (Apocalypsis Iohannis) 13:18.

Need more? "Hillary" in Latin Simplex = 75, the same as Draconis. Hillary = Draconis = 75. Hillary gives Kaine "his power, and his seat, and great authority." She is the Dragon.

It gets even worse. The total of the entire clause in Rev. 13:18 is important. The entire clause is "et numerus eius est sescenti sexaginta sex," meaning, "and his number is six hundred threescore and six," and the clause = 212 + 218, or 430. We need only add 18, which is the verse number, and which also is 6 + 6 + 6, to get 448, or 212 + 18 + 218, which added to 218 (Draconis or Hillary + Timotheus Cain) = 666. In other words, 6 + 6 + 6 + Hillary (or Draconis) + Timotheus Cain + et numerus eius est sescenti sexaginta sex = 666!

Also note that the 666, the 6 + 6 + 6, can be the actual Mark in two different ways: it can be a T, which in Latin = 18, and which corresponds to the Hebrew Tau, which WAS a mark on the forehead in the Bible; or it can be Aleister Crowley's 666 mark, in which the sixes are joined at the loop, sharing the loop, forming a kind of triangle.

Need I mention the "mark of Cain"? That is an obvious clue. The "mark of Cain" is the "mark of Kaine," the mark of the Beast.

You might object that this is still a bit complicated; but would God NOT encode the name of the Beast so that only few could possibly decode it? Would He make it obvious to all, or only to those with knowledge of Hebrew and Latin gematria? "Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast."

The Apocalypse of John is a vision of the future. But when we are warned about the future, we can change it. Knowing the future consequences of a certain course of action allows us to take other action instead, and to thereby avoid those consequences. Some prophecies in the Bible were indeed given as warnings, no more and no less; when the warnings were not heeded, then punishment followed, but only because the warnings were not heeded. The Apocalypse might be like that. Perhaps it is only a warning; perhaps it can be avoided, if America is righteous enough to avoid electing the Beast as Vice-President, and thus as future President.

Perhaps we have arrived at a pivotal moment in human history. Perhaps the question of whether or not the events of the Apocalypse come true or not depends on how righteous or unrighteous the people in the United States of America are right now. Will they vote for two wicked people, who will make the government act still more ANTI-CHRISTIAN than it acts now? Or will Americans vote for two people who have pledged to defend Christian values and the interests of Christians, two people who are PRO-CHRISTIAN?

What if the righteousness or unrighteousness of America in 2016 decides whether the events of the Apocalypse will come true or not?