|
Post by Eric Gajewski on Apr 6, 2018 18:18:21 GMT
TRADCATKNIGHT: Jews and gun control If necessary, it is moral to kill an aggressor in defense of innocent life “…the act of self-defense may have two effects, one is the saving of one’s life, the other is the slaying of the aggressor. Therefore this act, since one’s intention is to save one’s own life, is not unlawful, seeing that it is natural to everything to keep itself in ‘being,’ as far as possible. And yet, though proceeding from a good intention, an act may be rendered unlawful, if it be out of proportion to the end. Wherefore if a man, in self-defense, uses more than necessary violence, it will be unlawful: whereas if he repel force with moderation his defense will be lawful, because according to the jurists [Cap. Significasti, De Homicid. volunt. vel casual.], ‘it is lawful to repel force by force, provided one does not exceed the limits of a blameless defense.’ Nor is it necessary for salvation that a man omit the act of moderate self-defense in order to avoid killing the other man, since one is bound to take more care of one's own life than of another's.” St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, Q. 64 murder, Article 7
tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2018/04/jews-and-gun-control.html
|
|