Post by Eric Gajewski on Sept 12, 2017 14:13:11 GMT
TradCatKnight: False Pretexts to Disrupt the Lex Orandi
As the content of the 1948 “Memo” shows, the Papal Commission operated as a lobby group with the evident intention to gain the ear of Pius XII so as to influence future legislation on the liturgy.
Below, using the internal evidence of the “Memo” itself, we will see how the Commission set out to achieve its aims. First, it created a fake controversy over the authenticity of the Church’s centuries-old lex orandi, making it seem that somewhere along the way the Church had made a wrong turning. Then, having cast doubt on the integrity of Tradition, it proceeded to control the terms of the debate as follows.
tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2017/09/false-pretexts-to-disrupt-lex-orandi.html
As the content of the 1948 “Memo” shows, the Papal Commission operated as a lobby group with the evident intention to gain the ear of Pius XII so as to influence future legislation on the liturgy.
Below, using the internal evidence of the “Memo” itself, we will see how the Commission set out to achieve its aims. First, it created a fake controversy over the authenticity of the Church’s centuries-old lex orandi, making it seem that somewhere along the way the Church had made a wrong turning. Then, having cast doubt on the integrity of Tradition, it proceeded to control the terms of the debate as follows.
tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2017/09/false-pretexts-to-disrupt-lex-orandi.html